AI Features
Navigation
The Signposting Toolkit includes AI-powered tools to help improve symptom instructions and generate safe triage questions. All AI-generated content requires mandatory clinical review before publication, ensuring safety and clinical oversight.
Overview
The AI features are designed to support, not replace, clinical judgement. They assist with:
- Improving clarity and readability
- Generating appropriate triage questions
- Maintaining consistent tone and structure
All AI output is subject to the same clinical governance requirements as manually-written content.
AI Instruction Editor
The AI Instruction Editor helps improve the clarity and tone of symptom instructions while maintaining clinical accuracy.
How It Works
- Admin Initiates Request
- Admin clicks “Customise Instructions” on a symptom
- AI processes the current instructions
- Generates improved version
- AI Generation
- AI rewrites for clarity
- Maintains clinical accuracy
- Preserves key information
- Uses plain English principles
- Draft Creation
- Suggestion stored as DRAFT
- Original content remains unchanged
- Admin can preview changes
- Clinical Review Required
- Draft automatically enters PENDING state
- Must be reviewed before publishing
- Reviewer can approve, modify, or reject
- Publication
- Only after clinical approval
- Original version retained in history
- Full audit trail maintained
Features
- Clarity Improvement — Rewrites complex sentences
- Tone Consistency — Maintains NHS style guide
- Plain English — Ensures readability (reading age 9-12)
- Clinical Preservation — Keeps medical accuracy
- Undo Capability — Can revert to previous version
Safety Checks
- Never publishes automatically
- Always requires human review
- Original content preserved
- Change history tracked
AI Suggested Questions
AI Suggested Questions generates grouped triage-style questions to help staff gather information safely and consistently.
Question Categories
Generated questions are organised into logical groups:
- Red Flags
- Critical symptoms requiring immediate attention
- Safety indicators
- Urgency markers
- Urgency/Timing
- How quickly care is needed
- Time-sensitive factors
- Appointment priority
- Pathway Suitability
- Which service is appropriate
- Referral criteria
- Alternative options
How It Works
- Generate Questions
- Admin clicks “Get Questions to Ask”
- AI analyses symptom context
- Generates relevant question sets
- Review Required
- Questions enter PENDING state
- Must be clinically reviewed
- Can be edited during review
- Approval
- Clinician reviews for safety
- Verifies appropriateness
- Approves or modifies
- Usage
- Available on symptom pages
- Staff can reference when needed
- Supports consistent triage
Safety Considerations
- Questions screened for appropriateness
- No automatic publication
- Clinical review mandatory
- Can be rejected or modified
Smart Symptom Updates
When base library content is updated centrally, surgeries can choose to adopt updates or keep their local versions.
Update Detection
- System detects base library changes
- Surgeries notified of available updates
- Comparison shows differences
Update Process
- Admin reviews changes
- Can accept, modify, or decline
- Accepted changes enter review workflow
- Local customisations preserved
Benefits
- Stay current with best practice
- Maintain local adaptations
- Choose what to adopt
- Complete control over updates
Feature Flags
AI features can be enabled or disabled at multiple levels:
Control Levels
- Superuser — Global feature control
- Surgery — Per-practice enablement
- User — Individual user overrides (if surgery enabled)
Current Features
ai_instructions— AI Instruction Editorai_questions— AI Suggested Questionssmart_symptom_updates— Smart update notifications
Management
- Surgery admins can enable/disable
- Superusers control globally
- Features respect review workflow regardless of flag status
AI Safety Principles
Core Principles
- Human in the Loop
- All AI output reviewed by clinicians
- No automatic publication
- Human judgement always final
- Clinical Governance
- Same review process as manual content
- Audit trail maintained
- Reviewer accountability
- Transparency
- Clear indication of AI-generated content
- Original versions preserved
- Change history visible
- Accuracy Preservation
- Clinical facts maintained
- No unsupported changes
- Medical accuracy prioritised
- Reversibility
- Can undo AI changes
- Previous versions accessible
- No permanent modifications
AI Technology
Platform
- Azure OpenAI (secure server-side calls)
- Server-side processing only
- No client-side AI operations
- Secure API integration
Privacy & Security
- No patient data used
- Secure server communication
- Audit logging of all AI usage
- Token usage tracking
Best Practices
For Admins
- Review AI suggestions carefully
- Modify before approval if needed
- Test with staff before publishing
- Use for clarity, not clinical decisions
For Reviewers
- Verify clinical accuracy
- Check for appropriateness
- Ensure plain English
- Approve only when confident
For Staff
- AI questions are guides, not scripts
- Use clinical judgement
- Report concerns via suggestions
- Understand AI supports, not replaces
Limitations
What AI Cannot Do
- Replace clinical judgement
- Make clinical decisions
- Bypass review workflow
- Access patient data
What AI Can Do
- Improve clarity
- Suggest questions
- Maintain consistency
- Support efficiency
Related Pages
- Clinical Governance — How AI content is reviewed
- Symptom Library — Where AI tools are used
- Developer Guide — Technical implementation
Last updated: December 2025